|
|
|
"I used to be afraid of dying, I'm not anymore. I'm more afraid of what happens to the people who live..." from "And The Band Played On" "HIV is something you live with every day for the rest of your life. You may never die of it, but you always die with it..." Michael W. Connett, Grantor/Trustee - The Michael W. Connett LIVING Trust 2012 Worldwide LGBT Civil Rights Marches WE HAVE A DREAM...Help us realize it NOW! JOIN US 04/21/2012
(EHP, LLC 9/24/2011 all rights reserved & submission of copyright pending) |
| From: Mary S. Northington
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 9:42 AM Subject: Re: The Freedom Center Opening: Of Liberty and Justice for All As you have so appropriately suggested, neither the North Bank, nor Cincinnati, nor the Freedom Center represent freedom. The North Bank is a geographic location. Cincinnati continues to be a hot bed of racial unrest beneath the world of the privileged, and the Freedom Center represents 110 million dollars that should have been raised toward providing community improvement, particularly the prudent use of adequate educational resources (a sine qua non for real freedom), for all of the people. No one is really free. For examples, some are held prisoners by circumstances, some by the need for self aggrandizement, and some by the general betrayal of the principles of fairness and justice to which so much lip service is given. Even those who see themselves as powerful and privileged are bound by their need to find a way to justify their power and privilege without relinquishing either, and without facing up to the oppressiveness of their postures. All will be free when the truth in all regards is respected. Communication requires both a clear speaker and an attentive listener. *************************************************************** "I used to be afraid of dying, I'm not anymore. I'm more afraid of what happens to the people who live..." from "And The Band Played On" |
sobankbeacon (10:10:11 PM)
All the candidates have addressed the issues of low-income housing, slumlords and blighted properties with the solution to turn low-income renters into low-income homeowners. Many people receiving housing assistance are elderly or disabled and home ownership isn't of interest or appropriate for them. How would they fix the problem of Housing Choice Vouchers which are the HUD alternative to site-based assistance being refused by landlords in order to escape the Housing Quality Standards inspection?Do you know a bad Landlord (i.e.: A Landlord who doesn't give a damn about the Housing Quality Standards, the behavior of tenants, the maintenance/appearance of the properties or anything else BUT their financial bottom line.)?? Either through personal experience as a tenant or resident of a neighborhood one owns property in, or through word-of-mouth?? CHANCES ARE, YOU DO!! Especially if you or someone you know are on a low, fixed income and qualify for a HUD/Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher. Unfortunately, due to the problems inherent in those programs, bad landlords continue to thrive in the system and prey on its participants; The Majority of which (57% according to the HUD web site) are either Senior Citizens or the Disabled. Having been victimized by such individuals in the past; I have decided to combat this problem and advocate for tenants rights through my web presence and Home Page. Let me hear from you about your experiences. Hopefully, together, we can do something to at least bring some attention to this problem, if not actually achieve solutions.
"In the great majority of cases, a landlords decision to not rent through the Section 8 program is nothing more than subtle but effective discrimination against a perceived class of tenants!"
On the other Hand; there are those landlords who do rent through Section 8 and do so with only with their lowest-cost and lowest-quality units and indifference to exploiting desperate, vulnerable people for their own gain!!!
Neil Blunt (10:17:36 PM)
TO sobankbeacon: The elderly and disabled are persons who have worked all their lives and truly need the assistance. The HQS guidelines are way too loose and the inspections go too quickly because we have too many Section 8 units in our city. We need homeownership in order to grow this population and with homeownership comes pride in your own housing and what goes on in your neighborhood. Home ownership brings involvement and pride. If you don't own it you have less care and concern for the property. Couple that with poor absentee landlords and you have a road map for disaster. Take a look at Lationia today. It is not the same Lationia of 20 years ago and the people who live there are tired of the worsening of their neighborhood.This is about subtle, legal and effective discrimination of a perceived class! "We have too many section 8 units in our city" Cut the crap and lets talk about total residential Rental units period. Let's talk about the fact that HUD began phasing out site-based "projects" during the Reagan Administration. Let's talk about the evolution of off-site certificates now known as Housing Choice Vouchers that were designed to enable assisted families to remain in the community where they had made their home. Then lets stop, pause and reflect that the only residential Rental units that require an inspection for Housing Quality Standards are the ones for which the landlord agrees to accept a Housing Choice Voucher. So all residential rental units, although equally available on the Fair Market at that rate and require a business license of the landlord, are not held to equal accountability for Housing Quality Standards. Interesting how there's too many residential Rental units of one kind in the city and you can't wait to publicize your plans to provide more of the other kind. What's the difference... The slumlords on the Fair Market get a break by side-stepping the Housing Quality Standards Inspection. So much for any choice.
Fanfare for The Common Man...
"FREEDOM-is just another word for, NOTHIN' left to LOSE..." Janis Joplin
Kentucky voters will decide in November whether to rewrite the state's Constitution to outlaw gay marriages.
Cincinnati voters likely will decide whether to get rid of the city article that bars the city from adding gays to groups that are protected from discrimination.
Both groups should look to Covington for guidance.
One year ago, the City Commission expanded Covington's human rights ordinance to ban discrimination based on age, sexual orientation, marital status and parental status. It applies to employment, housing and public accommodations, such as hotels and restaurants.
The vote stands on its own as the right thing to do. No one should have to endure the cruelty and discrimination described by some of the expanded ordinance's supporters during public hearings last year.
But it's interesting to note what has happened in the year since:
Nothing.
No complaints, no frivolous lawsuits, no concerted effort on the part of homosexuals to get back at unfriendly landlords and bosses.
Gay-rights opponents had predicted that homosexuals would use the new ordinance as both a hammer to beat up on those who oppose them and as a crowbar to lever more rights, privileges and special treatment.
That neither has happened demonstrates that for the most part, gays simply want the same thing as non-gays: the ability to work, live, eat and go to school without facing hatred and discrimination.
City Manager Greg Jarvis said the publicity generated by the commission's protracted debate of the ordinance a year ago has been one reason why the city has received no complaints -- it made landlords, business owners and others aware of the city's new policies.
What confuses us is why more cities and counties in Greater Cincinnati haven't copied Covington. Those who don't explicitly ban discrimination against gays are tacitly approving of it.
That's not only wrong but wasteful of intellectual capital as well. Regional leaders say again and again they want to attract the new creative class, particularly to downtown areas. Signaling to a whole segment of the population, small though it is, that its money, brains and ideas aren't welcome works against that goal.
That's why local governments should adopt their own versions of Covington's ordinance. That's why Kentucky voters should reject the constitutional amendment banning gay marriages in November. And that's why Cincinnatians should put the question of eliminating Article XII on the ballot, and then vote to do so.
Publication Date: 05-07-2004
Friday, October 22, 2004
A Christian perspective on Issue 3 Your voice: Jim Edgy Much is in the news about Issue 3 and about gay marriage. Although there is little connection between these two, they have been combined by the opponents to Issue 3 who mainly cite the Bible as their basis of opposition. The supporters of Issue 3 stress the legal and fairness issues. I will discuss Issue 3 from a Christian perspective. Opponents' objection is that the Bible (mainly Leviticus) states homosexuality is an abomination. It does. But it also gives many other laws that we constantly ignore, i.e. (1) sex laws; (2) laws prohibiting interest on loans; (3) a law that all loans to the poor are to be forgiven if not paid by year's end; (4) you must not make a profit on goods sold to the poor; (5) support of slavery and animal sacrifice. Can you imagine following these rules? And if you curse your parents, commit adultery, have sex with your daughter-in-law or an animal, you should be put to death. (If you don't believe this, read Leviticus.) Why don't Phil Burress et al. enforce these laws too? Could it be that those laws might affect them, whereas the one about homosexuality doesn't? If you believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible, then you must practice all of it, not just those passages that support your personal bias. For Christians, these laws were replaced by Christ when he gave the two great commandments, "Thou shall love the Lord with all thy heart, soul, and mind; and thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself; upon these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets" (Matthew 22:34-46 - note it does not say "except for gays"). A very wise priest said, "The essence of Christianity is to love God and neighbor, and do as you please, so long as what you please doesn't come between you and your love of God and neighbor." This makes sense to me. And being gay certainly doesn't come between one's love of one's God and/or neighbor. To use the Bible as the basis to discriminate against lesbians and gays goes counter to Christ's commandment. I hope all will follow the words of Christ Himself, not some interpreter, and show their love of their neighbor by supporting Issue 3 and helping stamp out discrimination. Jim Edgy is a retired arts administrator who is the organist at Grace Episcopal Church and The Church of the Good Samaritan. |
The March on Covington!!!
Outside show is a poor substitute for inner worth." --Aesop
1043 Russell Street – Suite 1
859-291-2214 * mconnett@fuse.net
Last updated: Friday, December 30, 2011
Copyright (c)1999-Present: